DIALOGUE WITH THOMAS MERTON | PART 1
By faith, I knew this day would arrive. It marks the point of no return, only to move forward to Asia. Our departure is scheduled for September 29, with Korea as our destination. Our friends found a beautiful house in Yangpyeong, which I have written about many times, both from and about. Over the next several blog posts, I want to share Thomas Merton’s journal entry from the book Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander, followed by my responses from October 2020 and August 2025. I think it’s fitting to share my reflection, as Merton’s words confirmed the path we’ve been on for six years. This series will consist of four parts. I hope you will be able to follow along.
Preface
October 9, 2020
Below is a journal entry by Thomas Merton that essentially summarizes my wife’s and my desire to spend the rest of our lives living intentionally. My wife says that this reads like a manifesto of our life’s calling. As we reflect on how we arrived at this point, we see that it couldn't have happened without a significant amount of disillusionment and deconstruction. What is implied in this journal entry is multifaceted, encompassing theological, contemplative, and mystical aspects, as well as our appropriate posture, actions, and service to the world. Fundamentally, though not his intention, I believe it describes how each of us should live this life. I believe I can say that we understand this both intuitively and through experience. Although our experiences are not the same as Merton’s, there are enough congruencies to make it easy to follow and understand. Merton, being Merton, articulates it better than anyone else I know or have read.
Merton’s words are indented with my 2020 and 2025 comments, following each of Merton’s paragraphs. (Merton’s italicized words are his. I also italicized mine for emphasis.)
August 9, 2025
Looking back, I know exactly where and when I read this section of Merton’s journal as it seared into my heart. It was in Bali in 2019, in some random Airbnb poolside. For some reason, when I am physically outside of the US, I have always tended to think and perceive things more clearly. This was no exception. I noted the section and told myself I would revisit this section later.
Part 1
Thomas Merton, Conjectures of a Guilty Bystander, pp. 153-156
In Louisville, at the corner of Fourth and Walnut, in the center of the shopping district, I was suddenly overwhelmed with the realization that I loved all these people, that they were mine and I theirs, that we could not be alien to one another even though we were total strangers. It was like waking from a dream of separateness, of spurious self-isolation in a special world, the world of renunciation and supposed holiness. The whole illusion of a separate holy existence is a dream. Not that I question the reality of my vocation, or of my monastic life: but the conception of “separation from the world” that we have in the monastery too easily presents itself as a complete illusion: the illusion that by making vows we become a different species of being, pseudoangels, “spiritual men,” men of interior life, what have you.
2020
What amounted to this extraordinary spiritual epiphany took place on March 18, 1958, in a very ordinary place while performing a mundane duty of running errands for Merton. This was a revelation to Merton because this was not his understanding when he first joined the abbey in Kentucky. It was the experience of being one with God and the human race, for he saw others with God’s love, which also was in him.
2025
What Merton once conceived as “separation from the world” as “holy existence” was shattered through this mystical experience. The concept and call to separation were replaced by union, even with total strangers. Furthermore, as with Merton (as he writes in other places), we are also one with nature. That this union is multilayered, from union within oneself to with others and with otherness.
About two years ago, I was traveling from Yangpyeong to Seoul on a train. The train was sparsely populated with mostly older folks. Suddenly, I was overcome with compassion and love for all the passengers as I looked around. I knew that I could not have manufactured such compassion and grace, and that we are all somehow interconnected to being part of each other’s journeys.
Certainly these traditional values are very real, but their reality is not an order outside everyday existence in a contingent world, nor does it entitle one to despise the secular: though “out of the world” we are in the same world as everybody else, the world of the bomb, the world of race hatred, the world of technology, the world of mass media, big business, revolution, and all the rest. We take a different attitude to all these things, for we belong to God. Yet so does everybody else belong to God. We just happen to be conscious of it, and to make a profession out of this consciousness. But does that entitle us to consider ourselves different, or even better, than others? The whole idea is preposterous.
2020
We are all in the same boat as humanity. This IS the main point that levels all humanity as equals. No one is above or below, in or out, “better than others.” This way of thinking is decisively un-modern. Missions efforts in the modern paradigm still largely operate out of an impertinent attitude of superiority and thus extended paternalistic and patronizing relationships (which are not dissimilar to missions efforts during Western Colonialism), which essentially undermine the basic worth of each human being. Out of the realization (that we all belong to God) comes naturally what Merton describes as the solidarity with the others and sympathy and compassion for others (this certainly Is not to say we are the ones that are dishing out such worthy efforts, perhaps it is better to say co-sympathy and com-passion including us), basically arriving at a place of non-judgment and non-entitlement, while he assumes that those who are in the “profession” are conscious of belonging to God.
2025
Merton further dismantles the concept of holy separation by calling it preposterous. This preposterous idea certainly goes beyond missions, especially in this volatile and increasingly polarizing world. Extreme polarization works when there is a us and them, whoever the us and them may be. Somehow, to lump humanity as one is perceived as too risky and vulnerable. If we are honest with ourselves, it is not too far-fetched an idea that the entire modern construct developed out of “we,” whoever “we” are, being different or better than others. Thus, undoing this preposterous idea is a must.